Comet Loses Tail When Passing By the Sun
Comet Lovejoy suffers less damage than expected.
Summary: A newly seen comet lost its long, bright tail as it passed
through the sun’s atmosphere December 15. According to solar
researcher Karl Battams, the comet, named Comet Lovejoy, had its tail
when it entered the sun’s corona but reappeared tailless on the other
side. The tail could still be seen “gently floating out in space where it
was before perihelion,” according to Battams.
The comet passed within 87,000 miles (140,000 kilometers) of the sun’s
surface. Instruments called coronagraphs on several space
observatories noticed the encounter. Battams indicated surprise that
the comet was able to survive in the several million-degree solar corona
for almost an hour.
Lovejoy’s tail may be older dust and gas ejected before the comet
entered the corona. Comet tails are created when their icy surfaces
warm up to create a gas that gets blown outward by the sun’s solar
wind. Some of the comet’s gases can also be changed into charged
ions to form an ion tail. Comet tails always point away from the sun,
and Battams thinks Lovejoy will eventually regrow a new one.
Battams and other astronomers were amazed by the unexpected
survival of comet Lovejoy because comets usually are destroyed by
their close encounters with the sun. This comet was discovered by and
named after Australian amateur astronomer Terry Lovejoy, who first
spotted it November 27.
(Photo of the famous Halley’s comet as seen in 1986, from Wikimedia
Commons, credited to NASA/W. Liller.)
To read the entire article, click on LIVE SCIENCE.
Comment: Comets are not only among the most beautiful objects in
space, but they do send a message. What they proclaim is that we live
in a young universe, or at least a young solar system.
Comets are sometimes called “dirty snowballs” because they are made
up of frozen gases and dust. Scientists think they have been around
since the beginning of the solar system. What normally happens
whenever a comet approaches the sun is that ice in its nucleus
evaporates and the comet is slowly destroyed over time. Many short-
period comets have been observed to have grown dimmer each time
they have been seen. Besides having to deal with an unfriendly sun, the
perilous existence of comets is also increased by the danger of crashing
into planets, as happened to Comet Shoemaker-Levy in 1994 when it
smashed into Jupiter, and by the danger of being ejected from the solar
system.
Astronomers agree that comets lead relatively short lives and, without
some way of replenishing themselves, shouldn’t exist in an old solar
system of billions of years. So secular cosmologists have come up with
two hypothetical “birthplaces” for new comets. They speculate that
something called the Kuiper Belt exists beyond Neptune where short-
period comets (those with orbits of 200 years or less) are born and a
farther-out Oort Cloud (for comets with longer orbits). The problem is
that there is absolutely no evidence either one exists. A number of
objects beyond Neptune besides Pluto have been found. They are
called Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs) or Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs),
but they tend to be too large to ever become comet nuclei.
Some 2,000 years ago there was a bright object in the sky that did
send an entirely different message. A “star” appeared at the time of
Jesus’ birth to announce to some Wise Men that the long-awaited
Messiah had been born. It likely was a supernatural object because its
description in the Bible does not seem to fit with any natural
explanation. But its message is one everybody should take to heart.
The Savior, whose life and death earned for us the forgiveness of our
sins and the certainty of an eternal life in heaven, has come and
completed His work. This is why we have such joy at Christmastime.
“After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they
had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place
where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed. On
coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they
bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and
presented him with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh”
(Matthew 2:9-11).
PRINT (Black type on white background)
***************************************************************************
Want to be automatically notified each time there is a new
post? Just e-mail your request to [admin@lutheranscience.org].
***************************************************************************
QUESTION OF THE DAY
How many different versions of A Christmas Carol have been filmed?
***************************************************************************
1 Comment
Comets remind us that water ice is common in our solar system, so that
God could have used it to add maybe 30 feet of water to Earth's ocean
levels during the Flood. But I've just read through Ted Nommensen's
longer work on "The Flood and Science" (listed to the right of your blog
page), and would like you, Warren, and others to comment on it. For
instance, it's good where we can see God just letting ocean basins rise
relative to continental areas at the start of the Flood. Your LSI could
start the new year on a right foot by disowning the unreality of "created
reservoirs" spewing out their contents (an old creationist error). It's
just common sense that, if this happened, then the rock above would
have fallen into the now-empty pits to replace the water with an equal
volume of rock, this all having zero effect on world ocean levels.
Through Ted, you would want us to trust ICR "science" as it relates to
the Flood miracle. Also, you can correct his telling us that Noah was
600 years, two months, and 17 days old at the start of the Flood.
Genesis 7:11 says one month, not two. In Genesis 2:6, Ted is led
astray by the NIV translation that "springs" watered the Earth before
the Flood. This was just a bad guess, maybe picked up from a flawed
ICR scenario. With the created "dew" of Proverbs 3:20, the "mist"
here, and the created thunder storms of Job 28:25-28 (also denied by
ICR) you have more than enough evidence that there's been no
change in Earth's hydrology from before the Flood. (Common sense:
Water that goes up by evaporation has to come back down
somehow.) Let others comment on other points in Ted's work, such
as how today's coal deposits couldn't possibly all be just from plants
growing before the Flood. GLL
NOTE ON VISITOR COMMENTS: Visitor comments are invited including
those containing alternate views. However, comments containing
profanity or advertisements will not be published. After posting a
comment, please allow several hours for it to appear on the blog.
Comet Lovejoy suffers less damage than expected.
Summary: A newly seen comet lost its long, bright tail as it passed
through the sun’s atmosphere December 15. According to solar
researcher Karl Battams, the comet, named Comet Lovejoy, had its tail
when it entered the sun’s corona but reappeared tailless on the other
side. The tail could still be seen “gently floating out in space where it
was before perihelion,” according to Battams.
The comet passed within 87,000 miles (140,000 kilometers) of the sun’s
surface. Instruments called coronagraphs on several space
observatories noticed the encounter. Battams indicated surprise that
the comet was able to survive in the several million-degree solar corona
for almost an hour.
Lovejoy’s tail may be older dust and gas ejected before the comet
entered the corona. Comet tails are created when their icy surfaces
warm up to create a gas that gets blown outward by the sun’s solar
wind. Some of the comet’s gases can also be changed into charged
ions to form an ion tail. Comet tails always point away from the sun,
and Battams thinks Lovejoy will eventually regrow a new one.
Battams and other astronomers were amazed by the unexpected
survival of comet Lovejoy because comets usually are destroyed by
their close encounters with the sun. This comet was discovered by and
named after Australian amateur astronomer Terry Lovejoy, who first
spotted it November 27.
(Photo of the famous Halley’s comet as seen in 1986, from Wikimedia
Commons, credited to NASA/W. Liller.)
To read the entire article, click on LIVE SCIENCE.
Comment: Comets are not only among the most beautiful objects in
space, but they do send a message. What they proclaim is that we live
in a young universe, or at least a young solar system.
Comets are sometimes called “dirty snowballs” because they are made
up of frozen gases and dust. Scientists think they have been around
since the beginning of the solar system. What normally happens
whenever a comet approaches the sun is that ice in its nucleus
evaporates and the comet is slowly destroyed over time. Many short-
period comets have been observed to have grown dimmer each time
they have been seen. Besides having to deal with an unfriendly sun, the
perilous existence of comets is also increased by the danger of crashing
into planets, as happened to Comet Shoemaker-Levy in 1994 when it
smashed into Jupiter, and by the danger of being ejected from the solar
system.
Astronomers agree that comets lead relatively short lives and, without
some way of replenishing themselves, shouldn’t exist in an old solar
system of billions of years. So secular cosmologists have come up with
two hypothetical “birthplaces” for new comets. They speculate that
something called the Kuiper Belt exists beyond Neptune where short-
period comets (those with orbits of 200 years or less) are born and a
farther-out Oort Cloud (for comets with longer orbits). The problem is
that there is absolutely no evidence either one exists. A number of
objects beyond Neptune besides Pluto have been found. They are
called Kuiper Belt Objects (KBOs) or Trans-Neptunian Objects (TNOs),
but they tend to be too large to ever become comet nuclei.
Some 2,000 years ago there was a bright object in the sky that did
send an entirely different message. A “star” appeared at the time of
Jesus’ birth to announce to some Wise Men that the long-awaited
Messiah had been born. It likely was a supernatural object because its
description in the Bible does not seem to fit with any natural
explanation. But its message is one everybody should take to heart.
The Savior, whose life and death earned for us the forgiveness of our
sins and the certainty of an eternal life in heaven, has come and
completed His work. This is why we have such joy at Christmastime.
“After they had heard the king, they went on their way, and the star they
had seen in the east went ahead of them until it stopped over the place
where the child was. When they saw the star, they were overjoyed. On
coming to the house, they saw the child with his mother Mary, and they
bowed down and worshiped him. Then they opened their treasures and
presented him with gifts of gold and of incense and of myrrh”
(Matthew 2:9-11).
PRINT (Black type on white background)
***************************************************************************
Want to be automatically notified each time there is a new
post? Just e-mail your request to [admin@lutheranscience.org].
***************************************************************************
QUESTION OF THE DAY
How many different versions of A Christmas Carol have been filmed?
***************************************************************************
1 Comment
Comets remind us that water ice is common in our solar system, so that
God could have used it to add maybe 30 feet of water to Earth's ocean
levels during the Flood. But I've just read through Ted Nommensen's
longer work on "The Flood and Science" (listed to the right of your blog
page), and would like you, Warren, and others to comment on it. For
instance, it's good where we can see God just letting ocean basins rise
relative to continental areas at the start of the Flood. Your LSI could
start the new year on a right foot by disowning the unreality of "created
reservoirs" spewing out their contents (an old creationist error). It's
just common sense that, if this happened, then the rock above would
have fallen into the now-empty pits to replace the water with an equal
volume of rock, this all having zero effect on world ocean levels.
Through Ted, you would want us to trust ICR "science" as it relates to
the Flood miracle. Also, you can correct his telling us that Noah was
600 years, two months, and 17 days old at the start of the Flood.
Genesis 7:11 says one month, not two. In Genesis 2:6, Ted is led
astray by the NIV translation that "springs" watered the Earth before
the Flood. This was just a bad guess, maybe picked up from a flawed
ICR scenario. With the created "dew" of Proverbs 3:20, the "mist"
here, and the created thunder storms of Job 28:25-28 (also denied by
ICR) you have more than enough evidence that there's been no
change in Earth's hydrology from before the Flood. (Common sense:
Water that goes up by evaporation has to come back down
somehow.) Let others comment on other points in Ted's work, such
as how today's coal deposits couldn't possibly all be just from plants
growing before the Flood. GLL
NOTE ON VISITOR COMMENTS: Visitor comments are invited including
those containing alternate views. However, comments containing
profanity or advertisements will not be published. After posting a
comment, please allow several hours for it to appear on the blog.
Wednesday, Dec. 28 , 2011 Prefer to read this post in Blogspot? Click Here. PRINT
Including movies like Scrooged and Ebbie, more
than 60 English-language adaptations of the
Charles Dickens classic have been produced for
either the movie theaters or television.
Source: Parade (December 25, 2011)
than 60 English-language adaptations of the
Charles Dickens classic have been produced for
either the movie theaters or television.
Source: Parade (December 25, 2011)
The opinions expressed
here are those of The
Editor and do not
necessarily represent
the views of the Lutheran
Science Institute. Please
note that links in older
posts may be broken.
here are those of The
Editor and do not
necessarily represent
the views of the Lutheran
Science Institute. Please
note that links in older
posts may be broken.
About Me - Warren Krug
The Editor
Decades ago I attended a
so-called Lutheran
university where I could
have lost my faith. The
science professors promoted
the theory of evolution and
made fun of anybody who
believed in the account of
creation as presented in
the book of Genesis.
Thanks be to God, some
creationist literature and
the Bible soon helped get
me back on the right track.
Ever since then I have
taken an active interest in
the creation/evolution
controversy.
Background image from NASA
The Editor
Decades ago I attended a
so-called Lutheran
university where I could
have lost my faith. The
science professors promoted
the theory of evolution and
made fun of anybody who
believed in the account of
creation as presented in
the book of Genesis.
Thanks be to God, some
creationist literature and
the Bible soon helped get
me back on the right track.
Ever since then I have
taken an active interest in
the creation/evolution
controversy.
Background image from NASA
